Breadth over depth
Competitor research is wide and shallow. You are watching 20-50 companies, and for each one a handful of page types — pricing, top product pages, blog index, ad library, key review sites — so 5-10 pages per company. Hand-building a separate scraper for every source is engineering time you do not have. A general-purpose scraping API that can reliably render pages (run the JavaScript that builds them) and return structured output (clean, ready-to-use data like JSON) covers all of this in days, not months.
Diff and alerting
The whole point of competitor monitoring is spotting change. A good workflow saves each snapshot, then compares it against the previous one (a content diff) and alerts you when something meaningful shifts — a new pricing tier, a product launch, a removed feature, or a hiring spike for a specific role. Markdown output is far easier to diff than HTML, because it strips out layout noise so only the real content differences stand out. Layering an LLM (a language model) on top to summarize the diff catches meaning-level changes that a plain character-by-character diff would miss.
Ad and review platforms
Public ad libraries, Google Ads Transparency, G2 reviews, Capterra reviews, App Store reviews — these are all gated behind anti-bot defenses (systems that block automated visitors) or rate limits (caps on how many requests you can send). A general scraping API handles them. Specialized APIs sometimes do them better. The trade-off is engineering cost versus the number of vendors you juggle — for portfolios under 50 competitors, bundling everything into one general API is usually the right call.
